Manual testing handles complex test cases, while automated testing handles simpler, more repetitive tests. So, manual testing is still important. But adding automated testing makes your manual tests more efficient. Continuous Testing vs. Test Automation Continuous testing is an evolution of test automation. Well..it's because of the different behaviour in manual vs automated deployment, which I discovered. Let's look at this. When deploying manually, we get the following options: The default behaviour (outlined above) is to UPGRADE the solution. This will apply the solution with both additive & detractive behaviour. Manual review by an expert gives probably less false negatives certainly less false positives insight also concerning design and architecture, overall quality etc OTOH, automatic review is faster broader repeatable 6 OWASP Interpreting automatic analysis results Manual material handling systems have a slow speed compared to the automated ones. They also lack scalability and agility as you can't program a manual system to handle more than one operation. The manual system may lead to errors and inaccuracies as they rely on human labor. Here is a list of the key differences between each method: Difference #1 - Accuracy of Translated Code Difference #2 - Cost of Migration Planning & Execution Difference #3 - Speed of End-to-End Migration Difference #4 - Doesn't Rely on Outdated Documentation Difference #5 - Ability to Handle Enterprise Legacy Environments 1. Here's a look at its downsides. 1. Prohibitive Cost. Manual pen tests are significantly more expensive than automated tests. While automated pen tests are simply a matter of running software, a manual pen test must be planned. Rather than renting software, a business needs to hire security professionals. Depending on the nature of the control activity in question, either manual or automated controls may be preferred, or even a combination of the two. For example, it is highly recommended that clients have automated controls in place for processes such as backups of application and data files, network security (e.g. the use of firewalls KEY DIFFERENCE. Manual Testing is done manually by QA analyst (Human) whereas Automation Testing is done with the use of script, code and automation tools (computer) by a tester. Manual Testing process is not accurate because of the possibilities of human errors whereas the Automation process is reliable because it is code and script based. Manual cars are more fuel efficient - as the engines are lighter and less complicated you'll get more mileage from your fuel. The car isn't second-guessing gears either, which automatics tend to do, you have control over the gears and the way in which your car uses its fuel. Despite being time-consuming and needing a lot of manual effort, this process is not free of errors. Automated invoice processing makes it easier to extract information from an invoice, validate it, and keep it safe in the accounting system. Not only does it reduce manual efforts thus reducing the cost, but it is more efficient and accurate as Manual vs. automated inventory system There are many advantages to an automated inventory management system, but ultimately the system that's right for you depends on your business's unique features and priorities. Here are some of the most significant pros and cons to both inventory system types: Benefits of a manual inventory system Manual vs. Automatic cars