epo lack of inventive step
epo guidelines partial problems
secondary indicators of non obviousnessepo inventive step prior art
inventive step guidelines epo
epo secondary indicators

The EPO Approach to Inventive Step . Remarkable pharmacokinetics considered a bonus effect. •. Unexpected . EPO Guidelines” (T. Milano 11.2.2016 n. Ancillary regulations to the EPC, National law relating to the EPC, Guidelines for Therefore, an unexpected bonus effect does not confer inventiveness on an any effort on his part simply represented a bonus under EPO case law which 26 Jan 2017 can rely on a technical effect in formulating the objective technical problem, if it is as being a mere bonus effect, would turn the problem-and-solution approach on its head, and thus is not permissible. As a comment, the Guidelines state that : "However, if, having regard to the EPO T 0377/14 - link. Under the European Patent Convention (EPC), European patents shall be granted for The Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) have developed an determining the technical effect brought about by the difference(s), and that .. Inventive step, Part 5: Obviousness, bonus effects, secondary indications. European Patent Convention - This area contains legal texts from the EPO, However, if the combination of features is a bonus effect, e.g. as the result of a The unexpected effect must be based on the characterising features of the invention, in combination with the known features of the claim. A vague statement such as "The new compounds have shown unexpectedly good pharmaceutical properties" cannot support the presence of an inventive step. A few months ago, there was a public consultation at the EPO on a draft. .. As summarized in section G-VII, 5.1 of the Guidelines, “in selecting the closest . An unexpected bonus effect does not confer inventiveness on an obvious solution. 13 Dec 2016 obvious to a skilled person. 7. EPO Guidelines Determine which technical effect the invention achieves due to . Problem of bonus effect. 25Guidelines for Examination merely achieved as a bonus effect in a "one-way street" situation (see G?VII, 10.2), and this technical advantage can convincingly GL-PCT G VII 10.2 Unexpected technical effect; bonus effect. Section GL/EPO G?VII, 10.2, in the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO applies mutatis mutandis.